Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2018-10
  • 2018-11
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-05
  • 2019-06
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2019-12
  • 2020-01
  • 2020-02
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-04
  • 2020-05
  • 2020-06
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-09
  • 2020-10
  • 2020-11
  • 2020-12
  • 2021-01
  • 2021-02
  • 2021-03
  • 2021-04
  • 2021-05
  • 2021-06
  • 2021-07
  • 2021-08
  • 2021-09
  • 2021-10
  • 2021-11
  • 2021-12
  • 2022-01
  • 2022-02
  • 2022-03
  • 2022-04
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-09
  • 2022-10
  • 2022-11
  • 2022-12
  • 2023-01
  • 2023-02
  • 2023-03
  • 2023-04
  • 2023-05
  • 2023-06
  • 2023-07
  • 2023-08
  • 2023-09
  • 2023-10
  • 2023-11
  • 2023-12
  • 2024-01
  • 2024-02
  • 2024-03
  • 2024-04
  • 2024-05
  • br Gender difference hypotheses br Discussion According to t

    2018-10-29


    Gender difference hypotheses
    Discussion According to the explained difference among ADS syllabusses in Section 5.3, the effect of IQ on expert design skills is better than that on novices (the P-value for IQ and ADS-4 is 0.07 and is close tobeingcorrelated). Moreover, when the complexity of a project and design constraints increase, and the degree of being ill-defined in a design problem decreases, the influence of IQ on design skills becomes evident. However, the item (designer experience, complexity and functionality of design project, and a design problem being less ill-defined) that has a larger effect on this correlation cannot be indentified because no continual decrease in P-value occurs from ADS-1 to ADS-5 (because of both ADS-2 and an IQ P-value of 0.56). Testing the second rac protein about the effect of gender difference on IQ and design scores shows that no significant difference is observed in the IQ and design scores of males and females in this study compared with other predictors (i.e., spatial ability) that indicate that males are better than females (Newcombe et al., 1983). The implication is that if spatial ability is regarded as an indicator of design abilities, then spatial ability contradicts the results in terms of the absence of a significant difference between males and females in the aspect of design scores. The correlation between IQ scores and the total GPA is also measured in this study (P-value=0.217, Pearson correlation=−0.15, no correlation). The results indicate the lack of a significant difference between the average of design scores and students’ GPA. Furthermore, the threshold theory of creativity–intelligence about intelligence design for an IQ above 120 is measured. For students with an IQ above 120, the correlation between IQ and the mean ADS is the Pearson correlation=−0.073 and the P-value=0.79, which indicates the lack of a significant relationship, and threshold theory about creativity–intelligence is not confirmed in intelligence design.
    Conclusion Other concerns that emerged were about creativity versus intelligence tests. Meanwhile, researchers have emphasized the role of creativity in design, in which the broad concept of creativity induced difficulties in understanding the exact role of creativity in design. Moreover, the measurability of creativity and creativity tests is under debate. Certain intelligence innovation tests (Squalli and Wilson, 2014) that can be used for future studies are available. Based on different effective design factors and the outcomes (mental, cognitive, social interaction, collaboration, personality, problem-solving skills) of these factors, every designed predictive test should consider all aspects or might be combinations of cognitive and personality tests. In terms of success in designing a reliable test or questionnaire, Cross’ (1999) theory can validate that design is a special and separate type of intelligence.
    Acknowledgement
    Introduction The main aim of this paper is to analyze the results from a post-occupancy evaluation (POE) study of a restored industrial space: a former textile factory converted into a contemporary art and design gallery. The building is located in the city of Puebla, Mexico. The importance of preserving industrial spaces, in this case a textile factory, is discussed in relation to its new use. The research questions are as follows: (1) How convenient is it to provide a new use for an old and abandoned building? (2) Is the building appropriate and comfortable for its current use?(Figures 1 and 2). This paper addresses the principles of the 1987 Declaration of Puebla City as a World Heritage City and the connotation of the conservation of the industrial space with the Angelopolis mega project and its relationship with the contemporary art and design gallery in Puebla, Mexico. This document is structured with the following the sections: historical background of the building and the area, analysis of the concept of Industrial Heritage, research methodology, analysis of the conversion of “La Violeta” textile factory into an art gallery, description of the building, and the results of the POE of a converted industrial space into a contemporary art and design gallery called “Angeles Espinosa Yglesias”.